Skip to content

Management level · MCS

MCS past questions

Every sub-task set in the last 3 Management Case Study pre-seens CIMA has published materials for, summarised in our own words and sorted by core activity.

Topic map · Filter the questions · See how we'd mark three of them · All levels

Topic map

How often each topic came up across all 144 MCS sub-tasks in the 3 sittings we cover. These are patterns from past exams, not a forecast: CIMA can test any part of the syllabus.

Topics by sitting

Key (sub-tasks per cell):
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2–3
  • 4–5
  • 6–7

Topics, most tested first

  1. 1
    Business risksOften tested

    17 sub-tasks · 3 of 3 sittings · 15 of 18 variants · last seen May & Aug 2026

  2. 2

    14 sub-tasks · 3 of 3 sittings · 11 of 18 variants · last seen May & Aug 2026

  3. 3
    Projects and project teamsOften tested

    12 sub-tasks · 3 of 3 sittings · 11 of 18 variants · last seen May & Aug 2026

  4. 4
    Accounting treatmentsOften tested

    11 sub-tasks · 3 of 3 sittings · 11 of 18 variants · last seen May & Aug 2026

  5. 5

    11 sub-tasks · 3 of 3 sittings · 11 of 18 variants · last seen May & Aug 2026

  6. 6

    9 sub-tasks · 3 of 3 sittings · 9 of 18 variants · last seen May & Aug 2026

  7. 7
    Transfer pricingOften tested

    9 sub-tasks · 3 of 3 sittings · 9 of 18 variants · last seen May & Aug 2026

  8. 8
    Pricing strategySometimes tested

    8 sub-tasks · 3 of 3 sittings · 8 of 18 variants · last seen May & Aug 2026

  9. 9

    8 sub-tasks · 3 of 3 sittings · 8 of 18 variants · last seen May & Aug 2026

  10. 10
    Business models and valueSometimes tested

    8 sub-tasks · 3 of 3 sittings · 8 of 18 variants · last seen May & Aug 2026

  11. 11
    Financing and cost of capitalSometimes tested

    8 sub-tasks · 3 of 3 sittings · 8 of 18 variants · last seen May & Aug 2026

  12. 12
    Investment appraisal and real optionsSometimes tested

    8 sub-tasks · 3 of 3 sittings · 7 of 18 variants · last seen May & Aug 2026

  13. 13
    Groups, goodwill and joint venturesSometimes tested

    7 sub-tasks · 3 of 3 sittings · 7 of 18 variants · last seen May & Aug 2026

  14. 14
    Leadership, teams and engagementSometimes tested

    7 sub-tasks · 3 of 3 sittings · 5 of 18 variants · last seen May & Aug 2026

  15. 15

    4 sub-tasks · 2 of 3 sittings · 4 of 18 variants · last seen Nov 2025 & Feb 2026

  16. 16

    3 sub-tasks · 2 of 3 sittings · 3 of 18 variants · last seen Nov 2025 & Feb 2026

How we band topics
  • Sittings: 2 points if the topic came up in every sitting we cover, 1 point if it came up in more than one.
  • Variants: 2 points if it came up in at least half of the exam variants, 1 point if in at least a quarter.
  • Blueprint: 1 point if its core activity has the top time weighting at the level. Where every core activity has the same weighting, nobody gets this point.
  • 4 or more points is "Often tested", 2 or 3 is "Sometimes tested", and fewer is "Rarely tested".
  • "Fits this pre-seen" is separate: it shows when the pre-seen's industry or key themes use words linked to the topic (our summary stands in until key themes are written).

It is a count of what CIMA has asked before, not a forecast. Any part of the syllabus can come up.

Core activities against the blueprint

Each core activity's share of the 144 sub-tasks, next to its blueprint weighting. The blueprint weights exam time and sub-tasks vary in length, so treat this as a rough check.

  • A Adding valueWithin range

    19% of sub-tasks (28) · blueprint 15–25% of exam time

  • B Implementing decisionsWithin range

    19% of sub-tasks (27) · blueprint 15–25% of exam time

  • C Performance and costsWithin range

    21% of sub-tasks (30) · blueprint 15–25% of exam time

  • D Measuring performanceWithin range

    21% of sub-tasks (30) · blueprint 15–25% of exam time

  • E StakeholdersWithin range

    20% of sub-tasks (29) · blueprint 15–25% of exam time

Filter the questions

Showing 5 of 144 sub-tasks. Clear filters

Packaging · 2 sub-tasks

  • V4 · Task 2(a)Core activity E: Stakeholders

    Difficulties measuring goodwill on a planned acquisition.

    Groups, goodwill and joint ventures

  • V5 · Task 3(b)Core activity E: Stakeholders

    Accounting for an investment in a joint venture and its first months of trading.

    Groups, goodwill and joint ventures

Refurbished computers · 1 sub-task

  • V6 · Task 2(b)Core activity E: Stakeholders

    Difficulties accounting for goodwill if a planned acquisition goes ahead.

    Groups, goodwill and joint ventures

Hair salons · 2 sub-tasks

  • V4 · Task 1(b)Core activity E: Stakeholders

    How acquiring a foreign subsidiary affects the group's reported performance.

    Groups, goodwill and joint ventures

  • V6 · Task 1(b)Core activity E: Stakeholders

    Challenges in measuring and accounting for goodwill on an acquisition.

    Groups, goodwill and joint ventures

How Eighty Marks works on it

Three past MCS tasks, each matched to a practice task on the same topic in our question bank, with an illustrative marked answer: a score out of 150 against the pass line of 80, the four competencies, and the one thing to fix first.

The past task

Transfer pricing between two departments

MCS · Nov 2025 & Feb 2026 · Ressett · V2 · Task 3(a) · Core activity E (Stakeholders)

A transfer pricing strategy between two departments that suits the company as a whole.

Practise it in Eighty Marks

Pricing dishes from the central kitchen · Transfer pricing · set in Wuudbreak

Try a free MCS task

Illustrative example

84 / 150

PASS LINE 80 · ABOVE

  • TechnicalStrong: market and cost-based options compared
  • BusinessGood: applied to the two departments
  • PeopleNeeds work: managers' behaviour missing
  • LeadershipFair: one clear recommendation

Fix first: Explain how each department's manager would react to your price, because that is what decides whether trade happens.

Sample: an invented mark to show the shape of our feedback, not a real student's. AI marks are a guide to help you improve. They are not CIMA marks and not a prediction of your result.

The past task

Real options in an investment decision

MCS · May & Aug 2026 · Cartn · V2 · Task 3(b) · Core activity B (Implementing decisions)

Real options the board should weigh when evaluating the investment.

Practise it in Eighty Marks

Appraising a lakeside spa · Investment appraisal · set in Wuudbreak

Try a free MCS task

Illustrative example

77 / 150

PASS LINE 80 · BELOW

  • TechnicalGood: options to delay, expand and abandon
  • BusinessNeeds work: not linked to the new product
  • PeopleFair: board's view considered
  • LeadershipFair: recommendation given

Fix first: Tie each real option to a decision the board actually faces on this product, with the point at which it would act.

Sample: an invented mark to show the shape of our feedback, not a real student's. AI marks are a guide to help you improve. They are not CIMA marks and not a prediction of your result.

The past task

Integrated report disclosures

MCS · May & Aug 2025 · Trimayr · V3 · Task 4(b) · Core activity E (Stakeholders)

Integrated report disclosures on the academy's intellectual, human and social capital.

Practise it in Eighty Marks

Climate disclosures and a 'carbon neutral' claim · Sustainability reporting · set in Wuudbreak

Try a free MCS task

Illustrative example

90 / 150

PASS LINE 80 · ABOVE

  • TechnicalGood: each capital covered
  • BusinessGood: uses the academy's facts
  • PeopleGood: readers' needs considered
  • LeadershipNeeds work: no view on what to leave out

Fix first: Recommend which disclosure matters most to investors and say why, rather than listing all three equally.

Sample: an invented mark to show the shape of our feedback, not a real student's. AI marks are a guide to help you improve. They are not CIMA marks and not a prediction of your result.

Practise these skills in your own pre-seen

Timed MCS tasks in the current pre-seen, marked in about a minute. Try one task free, no card needed.